Runyon Law Office, PLLC

  • Home
  • Attorney Profile
  • Areas of Practice
  • Staff
  • Food for Thought
    • Suggestions for Senior Dilemmas - 03/03/2020
    • SECURE in the Knowledge - 02/06/2020
    • Holiday Semi-Legal Offerings 12/19/2019
    • From One State to Another - 11/20/2019
    • What to Do with Those Documents - 06/05/2019
  • Food for Thought Archive
  • Your Thoughts
  • Directions
  • Contact Us
  • Our Town
  • Vital Signs Material
  • ABA pro bono letter

Joint Tenants Take Note by Phil Runyon

1/7/2014

 

Joint Tenants Take Note

As the heading suggests, I'm out to toss a little cold water on the common technique many of us employ to pass our worldly stuff on to our partners.  We figure that if we just hold our assets in both names "as joint tenants with rights of survivorship", then the moment one of us departs, our partner in tenancy will become the sole owner of what we've left behind.  And the best part is we'll have avoided the need for wills, probate and any other reason to call a lawyer for help.  Not so fast. After all, lawyers write most of the laws, and self-preservation is a strong motivator.

So, sure, if one joint partner dies, then the assets held that way do miraculously end up owned by the survivor - and without need of legal help getting there.  If the ownership stays that way, though, the survivor's estate is going to endure about a year of probate formalities, much to the undoubted chagrin of our offspring.  That's because - as I've mentioned before - assets solely in a decedent's name at death generally need probate to get themselves into another name, whether there's a will or not.  To make it even worse, let's say the survivor now also owns a condo in Ft. Myers or Phoenix,  If no steps are taken, his or her estate will be probating itself both in New Hampshire and where that winter getaway is located.  FYI, it recently cost $3,000 in probate fees just to get a solely-owned Florida condo into the kids' names - and all they wanted to do was sell it.

Joint ownership of assets also won't keep probate at bay if something happens to both owners at the same time.  That's a pretty rare occurrence, I know, but one most of us in this area have experienced, tragically, not long ago.  Under those circumstances, both estates require probate because there's no surviving owner.

What's the solution?  The preferred one would be a revocable trust, with you as your own trustee, and with all your assets re-titled in that name.  A couple would likely do fine with one joint trust these days.  Of course, you can take that other, riskier road of keeping those assets in joint ownership until the first partner's passing, but then you've got to make sure the survivor funds the same kind of trust before the second shoe drops.  

The positive spin on all this is that if you make good on your resolve to tidy up your planning, the decrease in stress may also add years to your life expectancy.


Posted 01/07/2014 Estate Planning

Comments are closed.

    Archives

    April 2019
    February 2019
    July 2018
    March 2018
    October 2017
    July 2017
    October 2016
    June 2016
    March 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    November 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012

    Categories

    All
    Asset Protection
    Estate Planning
    Miscellany
    Probate
    Real Estate
    Tax Planning

Copyright ©  2012-2021 Runyon Law Office, PLLC